Advent Quiet Day on
John the Baptist Saturday 13 December at Elsieshields
First Address
Almost all we know about John the Baptist comes from the 4
Gospels of the New Testament. In this first address I shall
draw on the first 3 Gospels especially, and in my second talk
the focus will be much more on the Gospel according to St
John.
St Mark, almost certainly the earliest Gospel to have been
written, begins his narrative with the appearance of John the
Baptist in the desert of Judea. This, he sees as the
fulfilment of the Old Testament prophecy, “Behold, I
send my messenger before thy face, who shall prepare thy way;
the voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of
the Lord, make his paths straight”. Here in Mark,
therefore, we encounter the adult John, with his direct
uncompromising message. So too, in Mark, we are introduced at
the outset to the adult Jesus, on the verge of His public
ministry.
St Luke’s Gospel, however, begins the gospel
narrative with a time thirty years or so earlier, when the
births and future ministries of both John the Baptist and
Jesus are announced through the vision of the angel, Gabriel.
Here the lives of John the Baptist and Jesus are in parallel.
Unlike Jesus, however, John was born when both his parents
were elderly and could not normally have been expected to be
blessed with the birth of children. John’s father was
Zechariah, an elderly priest of the temple, married to a
woman called Elizabeth. At the time of the revelation the
couple were childless. It was after Zechariah had been chosen
by lot to enter a holy area of the temple to burn incense by
an altar that the angel of the Lord appeared to him. This is
what the angel told Zechariah, (I shall quote from the
Revised Standard Version of the Bible), “Do not be
afraid, Zechariah, for your prayer is heard, and your wife
Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name,
John. And you will have joy and gladness, and many will
rejoice at his birth; for he will be great before the Lord,
and he shall drink no wine, nor strong drink, and he will be
filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother’s
womb. And he will turn many of the sons of Israel to the Lord
their God, and he will go before him in the spirit and power
of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children,
and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready
for the Lord a people prepared.” Zechariah, if you
pardon the pun, is dumbfounded at the revelation. How can
this be? I’m an old man and my wife too, is advanced in
years! The angel answers that he is Gabriel, who stands in
the presence of God, and has been sent to bring the good
news. Because Zechariah has not believed the message, Gabriel
tells him that he will be unable to speak until the time of
the child’s birth. The delay in Zechariah coming out of
the holy place had obviously begun to be disconcerting to the
people who wondered what was taking so long. When he came out
unable to speak, however, they realised that he had seen a
vision and because he had lost the power of speech he could
only make signs to them. After the time of his temple service
was over Zechariah returned home and we do not hear any more
of him until the time of John the Baptist’s birth when
the birth of John was taken as a sign of great blessing to
Elizabeth. On the 8th day following the birth, when John came
to be circumcised, the local folk thought he would be called
Zechariah, after his father, but Zechariah asked for a tablet
on which he wrote, “his name is John”. At this
Zechariah’s speech was restored, and he spoke, blessing
God. Such extraordinary things, St Luke records, were spoken
of throughout the hill country of Judea, as people asked
themselves, “What then shall this child be? For the
hand of the Lord was upon him.”
Apologies if what I have said in the last few minutes has
been something of a pedestrian lift from a narrative which
you will be familiar with, but I think it is important to
build on these earliest foundations and examine what great
things the people were expecting of this key figure in the
New Testament. John’s place in the Gospel is, after
all, unique. He was the one whom God had called to be His
herald, the forerunner of Jesus’ ministry.
From birth to manhood. This was a period, in Jesus’
case of around 30 years, the time from the infancy narratives
of the Gospels to the age, traditionally when Jesus began his
public ministry. What happened during these 3 decades? The
gospels are virtually silent in the case of Jesus’
life, save for the visit to the temple that St Luke records
when Jesus was aged 12. You remember how Mary and Joseph had
returned from Jerusalem with the rest of the pilgrims and
discovered to their consternation that Jesus was not in the
company. They hurried back to Jerusalem and found Jesus
conversing and putting questions to the temple elders. They
are asked by their son in the old King James version of the
Bible, “Whist ye not that I must be about my
Father’s business”.
With John the Baptist, however, there is not even one
story of this kind to interrupt the silent decades. After St
Luke tells us that “the child grew and became strong in
spirit and he was in the wilderness till the day of his
manifestation to Israel”, we do not meet John the
Baptist again in the New Testament until he appears by the
river Jordan proclaiming a baptism of repentance for the
forgiveness of sins.
So where was John the Baptist from the time of his birth
until the time of his appearance in the Jordan countryside?
St Luke says he was in the desert, and one idea that has been
widely canvassed was that John the Baptist may have been
brought up by a religious community such as the Essenes, who
lived an austere life by the shores of the Dead Sea. These
communities, we learn from the Jewish historian, Jospehus,
were ascetic and their discipline very strict. They prayed
communally several times a day like religious communities
today but what particularly distinguished the Essenes was the
practice they made of ritual washing a number of times daily.
The likeliest explanation for this symbolism was that it
expressed the idea of purity, or being made clean from sin.
John’s baptism was, of course, different in one major
respect and that was that baptism was a once for all act,
rather than something to be repeated many times over.
John’s baptism marked a decisive act, a turning to the
Lord in an act of repentance.
One reason why John the Baptist has been associated with
the Essenes is the emphasis they placed on water in a
ritualistic action, but another is that if John’s
parents were elderly when he was born it is quite possible
that he was orphaned at a relatively early age. If this is so
he may have been brought up by an Essene, or some such
similar community like that at Qumran which has given us the
Dead Sea Scrolls.
John was, in any case, a son of the desert and the
description that St Mark gives us in his Gospel shows that
his clothing and appearance were, like the desert itself,
stark and striking. Mark tells us that John was clothed with
camel’s hair and had a leather girdle round his waist.
In this respect John’s appearance closely resembled the
prophet, Elijah, and it is possible that John’s choice
was deliberate. Certainly, some of his compatriots made the
comparison between John the Baptist and Elijah explicit.
His food was locusts and wild honey. There is a popular
television programme featuring celebrities and their life in
the jungle and as part of the exercise they are invited to
eat all kinds of creepy crawlies. I can’t bear to watch
that kind of thing and on the first reading it seems that
John the Baptist was doing something similar in eating
locusts. It came to me as a relief when I took O level
divinity to learn, however, that an alternative translation
of what John ate was that they were carobs, the seed of the
carob tree. Recently I was fortunate to go to Cyprus where
the tour guide told us that Germans refer to the carob tree
as” Johannesbrot”, John’s food, or
bread.
Now one of the reasons I chose John the Baptist to think
on this Advent is that if we reflect on his lifestyle and his
teaching, there is much in them that challenges us today.
John the Baptist ate frugally and had the simplest of
lifestyles. He lived in 1st century Palestine, true, and was
a member of a culture which differs radically from our own.
Nevertheless, is John not the antithesis of so much that is
regrettable in our consumerist throwaway society? Although it
is not declared explicitly, advertising prompts us, as
Christmas approaches, to spend to excess and to eat and drink
more than we could possibly need.
St Matthew and St Luke both draw on a tradition which
outlines some of John the Baptist’s ethical teaching,
and here again we find, if we look at John the Baptist in a
new light, that he is astonishingly relevant. Many of the
problems in our world today are caused, I believe, by the
fact that mankind, in his development, has never successfully
transcended tribalism. Look at any of the world’s
hotspots, the recent atrocities in India, the agenda of Al
Qaeda worldwide, the perceived gulf between Christianity and
Islam, then in the late 20th century, ethnic cleansing in the
Balkans and Rwanda.
What insight does John give us here? When he came across
Jews coming for baptism who trusted in the membership of
their own race, or their descendancy from Abraham to win them
salvation, he called them “a brood of vipers”. He
told them they must bear fruits of repentance. It was not
enough to say “we have Abraham as our father”.
John told them unequivocally that it was no use saying that.
God could raise up children for Abraham from the stones of
the desert. One of the unfortunate things when one language
is translated into another is that we often lose original
meanings, and certainly this is so in the case of a play on
words. This is actually what is happening here. In Aramaic
the words for stones and children have a similar resonance to
them. So here you see, John is showing us that to make a race
or a religion an idol that will save us is folly. It can in
no way help us escape from the moral imperative which is to
be gracious and just towards our neighbour. This is a message
which is as urgent and relevant today as ever it was when
John addressed his hearers by the River Jordan.
This leads us on nicely to the remainder of John the
Baptist’s ethical teaching. Luke records that the
multitudes asked him, “what shall we do?”
John’s reply accords with the central tenets of justice
enshrined in the prophetic tradition of the Old Testament.
“He who has 2 coats”, John says, “should
share with a person who has none”. And so it ought to
be with food.
Tax collectors in the Gospels are represented as sinners
who transgressed the law, and one of the main reasons why
this was so is that they took more than their just due from
the monies they levied. John doesn’t mince his words
here and tells them that they should collect no more than is
appointed for them.
The teaching of John the Baptist here, therefore,
enshrines the central ideas of social morality that are at
the heart of the prophetic tradition of the Old Testament.
These moral principles, the justice that God desires, stand
the test of time and society as a whole is weakened when the
wealthy and the powerful look exclusively to their own
interests, and allow the disadvantaged to reap the
consequences of their selfish actions. If you doubt the
relevance of John the Baptist, think about the immense
economic difficulties Britain and many other nations are in
because of the excesses of an economic system which lacks
moral control, where those in the Stock Market play with
billions of pounds of other people’s money, risking the
lives of millions in acts of reckless casino capitalism.
The last group of people we hear about who approached John
the Baptist were soldiers. It is unlikely that they were
actually Roman soldiers. They were probably Jewish soldiers
who had a limited autonomy under the Romans to keep order in
Jerusalem and its environs. When this group in society looked
to John for teaching he advised them, “rob no one by
violence or by false accusation, and be content with your
wages.”
If you think well, all this is very fine but John the
Baptist lived such a long time ago, what can he possibly say
to us today that has any relevance, just call to mind the
outrage that emerged when it came to light that the American
military were abusing, even torturing the prisoners in Iraq.
Rightly, the international community asks questions what is
actually going on in Guantanamo Bay. And of course it’s
not just the Americans who are open to moral scrutiny here. A
number of British soldiers were also involved in actions
against Iraqis, which given the speed that these events can
be posted on the Internet, effectively place countless of
their colleagues in danger of reprisals from insurgents. So
it is possible for the military to get out of control and in
an abuse of their position of power to terrorise the civilian
population by acts of violence, bloodshed and rape. Consider
these things in our world of today and look at John the
Baptist’s teaching afresh. He stands for justice and
challenges all of us to respond to our neighbour in ways that
are consistently ethical. Inconveniently, John the Baptist
also challenges those who control others from their position
of power to look to their actions. One day they will be
judged for them. John’s message was that the coming of
the Lord in judgment was about to take place. The axe was
poised to strike at the root of the tree and any tree that
did not bear good fruit would be cut down and thrown into the
fire.”
Here, then, and appropriately striking the note of
judgement that was about to come to the earth, I shall close
this first talk. In the second, I shall focus on John’s
baptism and his spirituality.
Introduction
Second Address
|